Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 9/11/1984
State v. Carter
Citations
- 681 S.W.2d 587
- 1984 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 2572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]he word „display‟ is defined by the Random House College Dictionary, Revised Edition, as meaning „to show; exhibit; make visible . . .‟”
- “The defendant’s open and visible use of the blackjack was a display of the weapon, regardless of whether the victim or any of the witnesses saw it. The weapon was there to be seen had anyone happened to look in that direction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cornelius, Duncan, Tatum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1990-08-22· cited 1,986×
- State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1987-07-21· cited 357×
- State v. KeelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1994-04-28· cited 175×
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-02-24· cited 9×
- State v. PeatCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1990-02-21· cited 7×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1986-01-28· cited 4×
- State of Tennessee v. Laquinton BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2016-06-29
- Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-09-26
- State of Tennessee v. Teros Anderson Sweeney, AliasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2019-10-11
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.