State v. Carter
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 645
- 95 N.E.3d 443
Syllabus
DEATH PENALTY - SENTENCING - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL - SIXTH AMENDMENT: Ohio's death-penalty statute does not require judicial fact finding before the defendant can be sentenced to death, because the jury must find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of an aggravating factor for the death penalty to be a sentencing option and therefore, Ohio's death-penalty statute does not violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. (Hurst v. Florida, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), distinguished.)
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2016-01-12· cited 1,067×
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 156×
- State v. MasonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-27· cited 16×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-01-25· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.