State v. Williams
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1358
Syllabus
Defendant, sentenced to death for aggravated murder, appeals trial court's denial of his motion for a new mitigation trial on the basis that a recent United States Supreme Court decision, Hurst v. Florida, rendered Ohio's capital sentencing scheme unconstitutional. Ohio's death-penalty scheme did not violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a trial by impartial jury where the law required the jury to make the critical findings that rendered the defendant eligible for the death penalty.
Judges: Ringland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2016-01-12· cited 1,067×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-16· cited 250×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1996-06-05· cited 167×
- State v. SinitoOhio Supreme Court· 1975-07-09· cited 86×
- State v. Roberts (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-30· cited 31×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-01-25· cited 8×
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.