State v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conviction abates because it is moot and for the lack of an indispensable party
• conviction abates because it is moot and for the lack of an indispensable party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Peters
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1995-08-10· cited 52×
• State v. Morris
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-02-23· cited 47×
• Surland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-11· cited 40×
• State v. Dalman
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-08-24· cited 39×
• State v. Carlin
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2011-03-25· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Hernandez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2019-03-13· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. De La Zerda
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-09-15· cited 19×
• State v. Hoxsie
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 17×
• State v. Burrell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-10-02· cited 14×
• People v. Robinson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-08-07· cited 12×
• Ex Parte Estate of Cook
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2002-07-03· cited 10×
• State v. Gomes
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1976-09-21· cited 9×
• Joubert v. McKernan
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-04-04· cited 4×
• State v. Moeller
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-06-07· cited 4×
• Strickland v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-10-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Durham v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1971-03-08· cited 166×
• City of Newark v. Pulverman
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-03-30· cited 63×
• Wetzel v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1962-11-05· cited 20×
• Bagley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-07-28· cited 20×
• Hartwell v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1967-02-08· cited 19×
• Raymond v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 7×