Skip to main content
· 6/30/2009

Garcia v. City of Hartford

Citations

  • 972 A.2d 706
  • 292 Conn. 334
  • 2009 Conn. LEXIS 148
  • 186 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2998

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he meaning ascribed to the term employee under labor law is consistent with its common meaning”
  • ‘‘[w]e ordinarily look to the dictionary definition of a word to ascertain its commonly approved usage’’
  • ‘‘[T]he adjectives that precede the term employee in . . . the agreement—‘fulltime, permanent’ and ‘probationary’—indicate current employment status. A retiree undoubtedly would not have either a full-time, permanent or a probationary status.’’ (Emphasis in original.)
  • failure to exhaust administrative remedies implicates trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction
  • declining to address claim not raised before trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz, McLachlan, Rogers, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.