Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/1/1986
State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 200 Conn. 323
- 512 A.2d 140
- 1986 Conn. LEXIS 881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing article first, § 8, of constitution of Connecticut, as amended by article seventeen of amendments
- discussing article first, § 8, of constitution of Connecticut, as amended by article seventeen of amendments
- finding sufficient involvement for probable cause where defendant fled with assailants, remained in their company
- “it was reasonable for the trial court to draw the inference that [the defendant] would not have fled with the assailants and remained in their company unless he was also involved”
- probable cause hearing “is a critical stage in the prosecution”
- char- acterizing right to probable cause hearing as ‘‘constitu- tional safeguard’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Healey, Peters, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-04-11· cited 139×
- State v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-12-07· cited 117×
- State v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-06· cited 111×
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-14· cited 99×
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-17· cited 98×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 89×
- State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-09-14· cited 89×
- State v. HaffordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-07· cited 89×
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-11-13· cited 88×
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-01· cited 83×
- State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-03· cited 74×
- State v. GantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 74×
- In re Ralph M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-23· cited 65×
- State v. SimmsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-11-25· cited 60×
- State v. RollinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-02· cited 60×
- State v. NiblackSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-20· cited 56×
- State v. ShannonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-01· cited 50×
- State v. McPhailSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-05· cited 43×
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-03-06· cited 43×
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-04-01· cited 1,814×
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 1,743×
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,151×
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1952-06-09· cited 993×
- Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 651×
- Guardians Assn. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of New York CitySupreme Court· 1983-07-01· cited 558×
- United States v. BlueSupreme Court· 1966-05-23· cited 423×
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court· 1981-06-23· cited 211×
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-10-02· cited 199×
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-02-04· cited 192×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.