Skip to main content

State v. Carlton

Citations

  • 297 Kan. 642
  • 304 P.3d 323
  • 2013 WL 3122518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a search incident to a lawful arrest as an exception to the warrant requirement
  • “The only remaining inquiry is whether the appropriate remedy is to suppress the evidence seized. This is a question of law.”
  • \The only remaining inquiry is whether the appropriate remedy is to suppress the evidence seized. This is a question of law.\
  • \The only remaining inquiry is whether the appropriate remedy is to suppress the evidence seized. This is a question of law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.