State v. Capers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “when the eyewitness report included numerous details, neither brevity of observation nor stress precluded the accuracy of eyewitness identification”
• applying the factors set out in Burch to determine whether evidence of the eyewitness testimony was sufficient to support a jury conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-07-09· cited 126×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-02-19· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• United States v. Mendenhall
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
• State v. Daniels
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-08· cited 119×
• State v. Burch
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-08-15· cited 78×
• United States v. Dennis George Holland
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-06-16· cited 75×
• State v. Ellingson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-04-11· cited 45×
• Wold v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-10-14· cited 27×
• State v. Myers
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-12-24· cited 9×
• State v. DeSart
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-11-13· cited 7×
• State v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-24· cited 5×
• State v. Burgess
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-03-26· cited 5×
• State v. Roehl
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-07-14· cited 1×