Nebraska Court of Appeals· 4/13/1993
State v. Caniglia
Citations
- 510 N.W.2d 372
- 1 Neb. Ct. App. 730
- 1993 Neb. App. LEXIS 209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a driver’s consent to the search of a vehicle did not extend to a passenger’s makeup purse found in the vehicle
- holding a driver’s consent to the search of a vehicle did not extend to a passenger’s makeup purse found in the vehicle
- suppressing evidence obtained during the search of a passenger's make-up purse when the purse was found under the seat in which the passenger was sitting
- “While Officer Farrow sought the driver’s consent and proceeded to search the van, Officer Muller questioned Caniglia.”
- “While Officer Farrow sought the driver’s consent and proceeded to search the van, Officer Muller questioned Caniglia.”
- male driver’s consent to search of vehicle did not extend to female passenger's make-up purse as make-up purse was not item that officers could have reasonably believed belonged to male driver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connolly, Miller-Lerman, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FriedelIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-08-17· cited 65×
- People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-07-15· cited 42×
- State v. BoggessSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-08-24· cited 23×
- State v. HardingUtah Supreme Court· 2011-12-16· cited 23×
- State v. ButzkeNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-07-21· cited 11×
- Marganet v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-31· cited 8×
- State v. DanielsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-06-24· cited 8×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-06· cited 7×
- State v. AnderaNebraska Supreme Court· 2020-10-30· cited 6×
- State of Missouri v. Theresa O'ConnorMissouri Court of Appeals· 2023-12-19
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- State v. ZachodniSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-02-13· cited 85×
- State v. ColemanNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 68×
- State v. MeltonNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 53×
- State v. HicksNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-08-28· cited 39×
- State v. MasatNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-01-24· cited 37×
- State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 35×
- United States v. Eddie Raymond RuizEighth Circuit· 1991-06-19· cited 30×
- State v. PopeNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-02-14· cited 30×
- State v. Van AckerenNebraska Supreme Court· 1975-11-06· cited 27×
- State v. SchwartzNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.