Connecticut Appellate Court· 12/31/1996
State v. Campfield
Citations
- 44 Conn. App. 6
- 687 A.2d 903
- 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- compelling defendant to submit to atomic absorption test did not violate article first, § 8
- ‘‘[Section] 53a-49 [a] [2] requires an accused to have undertaken a substantial step toward committing the intended crime. This standard focuses on what act remains to be done to commit the intended crime and not what acts have been done.’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EvansConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-02-18· cited 16×
- State v. HazelConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-04· cited 13×
- State v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-11-30· cited 9×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-01-26· cited 4×
- State v. CalesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-05-23· cited 3×
- State v. JamisonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-09-16
- In re Shane M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-09-15
- State v. MoralesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-03-29
- State v. Daniel B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-04-05
- State v. CampfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-03-27
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-25· cited 1,423×
- Brown v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1986-11-03· cited 227×
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-08· cited 184×
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 156×
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-02· cited 138×
- Velasquez-Mercado v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 122×
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 114×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-23· cited 110×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 108×
- State v. DelossantosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-23· cited 101×
- Kohlfuss v. Warden of Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-07-27· cited 96×
- State v. GrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-14· cited 85×
- Adolf v. Wichita Falls General HospitalSupreme Court· 1987-11-02· cited 85×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 74×
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-02· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.