State v. Preston
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1057
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening, untimely filed application, good cause, delay in mailing by prison mail room, lack of funds, cannot extend good cause for indefinite period of time. The application for reopening has been filed more than ninety days after journalization of the appellate judgment subject to reopening. The appellant has failed to establish good cause for the untimely filing of the application through his claims of delay associated with the prison mailing room and lack of funds to mail the application. Finally, the Ohio Supreme Court has established that good cause cannot excuse the lack of timely filing for an indefinite period of time. Application for reopening is denied.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court· 1982-03-02· cited 2,744×
- State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 212×
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 197×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2004-08-11· cited 173×
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 117×
- State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 106×
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 1999-08-25· cited 36×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1997-04-16· cited 18×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1994-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-28· cited 7×
- State v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-07· cited 4×
- State v. McCornellOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-15· cited 3×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1994-11-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.