State v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the tolling period ended when employer actually learned of crime, not when employer could have discovered crime through the exercise of reasonable diligence
• tolling period ended when employer actually learned of crime, not when employer could have discovered crime through the exercise of reasonable diligence
• tolling period ended when employer actually learned of crime, not when employer could have discovered crime through the exercise of reasonable diligence
• “[T]he determination of when the crime was discovered is a factual one[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Royal v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-07· cited 11×
• Jannuzzo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-09· cited 11×
• The State v. Crowder
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-09-20· cited 6×
• Pennington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-16· cited 6×
• Kenerly v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-22· cited 5×
• Paul F. Jannuzzo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-09
• Warren Hampton Pennington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-16
• Kevin Russell Kenerly v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-22
• Angelia Countryman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-06-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Womack v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1990-03-13· cited 23×
• Beasley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-07-07· cited 20×
• State v. Conzo
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-07-08· cited 20×
• Merritt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-02-19· cited 14×
• State v. Lowman
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-12-05· cited 9×