Skip to main content

Royal v. State

Citations

  • 723 S.E.2d 118
  • 314 Ga. App. 20
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 495
  • 2012 WL 373354
  • 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where order of nolle prosequi entered as to count of indictment, issues pertaining to that count rendered moot
  • “The tolling period is not extinguished when the injured party should have known; rather, it ends when the injured party has actual knowledge of the crime.” (punctuation omitted)
  • statute of limitation did not begin to run on the date that a tipster had reported a crime, hut rather on the date that an investigator first substantiated the tipster’s allegations
  • statute of limitation did not begin to run on the date that a tipster had reported a crime, but rather on the date that an investigator first substantiated the tipster’s allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Mikell, Dillard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.