Skip to main content

Beasley v. State

Citations

  • 536 S.E.2d 825
  • 244 Ga. App. 836
  • 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 3134
  • 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statute of limitation for burglary began to run when fingerprint evidence was analyzed and matched, not when law-enforcement lifted the fingerprint from the crime scene
  • rejecting defendant’s assertion that the State should have been charged with knowledge of his identity because it did not exercise reasonable diligence in matching his fingerprint until more than four years after the burglary
  • providing that statute requires actual knowledge
  • “[Ujnless and until [a fingerprint found at a crime scene] is matched to an actual person, it cannot be said that the police know who committed the crime.”
  • “The fingerprint was apparently the only material clue. . . .”
  • person unknown exception applied where police had no suspects and the only evidence was a fingerprint lifted from the scene of a burglary, which went unmatched until being run through a fingerprint database over four years later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruffin, Andrews, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.