State v. Caldwell
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3015
Syllabus
Because Caldwell engaged in a single, continuous course of conduct, application of the alternative means doctrine is proper and only juror anonymity as to guilt is required. Admission of \other acts\ evidence was harmless, and admission of the 911 calls was proper as evidence of Caldwell's continuous course of conduct. Caldwell was not prejudiced by any improper comments by the prosecutor during closing arguments. Caldwell's conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Judges: Beatty Blunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 1,321×
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-01· cited 913×
- State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court· 2008-06-18· cited 220×
- State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-20· cited 212×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 1989-10-18· cited 136×
- State v. TeitelbaumOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-21· cited 32×
- State v. IbrahimOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-28· cited 29×
- State v. BoydOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.