Skip to main content
· 5/16/2007

State v. Cadigan

Citations

  • 159 P.3d 348
  • 212 Or. App. 686
  • 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although the significance of evidence may become better appreciated after trial, that does not make the evidence “newly discovered”
  • “ORCP 64 B(4) does not categorize information personally known to a defendant before trial, but not to the party’s legal counsel until later, as ‘newly discovered’ evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.