State v. Cadigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State must establish \reasonable basis\ to support law distinguishing between business partnerships organized in Vermont and those formed in other states
• State must establish “reasonable basis” to support law distinguishing between business partnerships organized in Vermont and those formed in other states

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baker v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-12-20· cited 168×
• Strahler v. St. Luke's Hospital
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1986-02-18· cited 105×
• Benning v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-01-28· cited 37×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1902-12-09· cited 28×
• State v. Shedroi
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1903-05-16· cited 28×
• People ex rel. Short v. Warden of the City Prison
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1911-07-07· cited 17×
• Omya, Inc. v. Town of Middlebury
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-07-25· cited 7×
• State v. Shop and Save Food Markets, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-17· cited 7×
• State v. Hazelton
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1906-03-08· cited 5×
• State v. Abraham
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1905-08-12· cited 4×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Yick Wo v. Hopkins
  Supreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 3,789×
• State v. Hoyt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1898-01-26· cited 24×