State v. Cabrera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding period from October 13 to October 29, 2000, was sixteen days because the first day is excluded but the last day is included under Rule 6(a) or Rule 1.3.
• “[T]he goal of administrative [drivers’ license] suspension is to remove drunk drivers from the streets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-19· cited 31×
• State v. McDermott
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-07-08· cited 22×
• State v. Cifelli
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-04-05· cited 7×
• In re Jessie T.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-06-08· cited 3×
• Freelance Interpreting Services, Inc. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-09· cited 2×
• State v. Miguel
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-11-23· cited 1×
• Tornabene v. Bonine
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zamora v. Reinstein
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-07· cited 175×
• State v. Mendoza
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-07· cited 26×
• Benitez v. Dunevant
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-07-31· cited 22×
• Bedard v. Gonzales
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-08-03· cited 17×
• Thielking v. Kirschner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-07· cited 17×
• Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-10-16· cited 10×
• Salzman v. Morentin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-12· cited 10×
• State v. Skiba
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-03-29· cited 6×
• Upton v. Cochise County Board of Adjustment, District 1
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-01-11· cited 5×