Bedard v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because of time required to prepare ballots, five-day limit for challenging nomination petitions means five calendar days and Rule 6(a) does not apply
• five-day limit for challenging nomination petitions means five calendar days, and Rule 6(a) does not apply
• interpreting period for challenging petitions in superior court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brousseau v. Fitzgerald
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 44×
• Berry v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-03-07· cited 23×
• Thielking v. Kirschner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-07· cited 17×
• State v. Mohajerin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-29· cited 16×
• Sarwark v. Thorneycroft
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-06-12· cited 14×
• Pace v. Pace
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-03-19· cited 13×
• State v. Cabrera
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-04-23· cited 8×
• Bohart v. Hanna
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 7×
• Klebba v. Carpenter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 5×
• Smith v. Board of Directors
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-19· cited 4×
• Fisher v. City of Apache Junction
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-07-31· cited 3×
• State v. Miguel
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-11-23· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. Hesam Mohajerin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-10-16· cited 10×
• Blaine v. McSpadden
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-09-13· cited 8×