Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/12/2012

State v. Burton

Citations

269 P.3d 337
165 Wash. App. 866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[t]he Barker factors are relevant to the due process inquiry . . . , bearing in mind that we are analyzing [the defendant’s] right to due process, not a right to a speedy appeal”
trial transcript that had “hundreds of typographical and stenographical errors” that were supplemented with a “14-page affidavit” by the State
RAPs “allow for input by trial counsel for both sides and an ultimate determination of the sufficiency of the record by the judge before whom the proceedings were held.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siddoway, Kulik, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.