· 4/13/1994
United States v. Richard Mohawk
Citations
- 20 F.3d 1480
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2576
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 4918
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7108
- 1994 WL 123112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that ten years of incarceration was not determinative of prejudice issue
- holding Doggett inapplicable to delayed retrial: “Rather, we think the rules established in our prior cases remain valid . . . ”
- concluding that mere speculation as to prejudice carries no weight
- requiring defendant to show “actual trial prejudice in the event of a second prosecution in order to win outright dismissal”
- “The manner in which a defendant conducts his defense cannot establish his state of mind at the time he opted for self-representation.” (quotation marks omitted)
- “The manner in which a 7 defendant conducts his defense cannot establish his state of mind at the time he opted for self-representation.” (quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcon, Norris, O'Scannlain
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.