Skip to main content
· 4/13/1994

United States v. Richard Mohawk

Citations

  • 20 F.3d 1480
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2576
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 4918
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7108
  • 1994 WL 123112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that ten years of incarceration was not determinative of prejudice issue
  • holding Doggett inapplicable to delayed retrial: “Rather, we think the rules established in our prior cases remain valid . . . ”
  • concluding that mere speculation as to prejudice carries no weight
  • requiring defendant to show “actual trial prejudice in the event of a second prosecution in order to win outright dismissal”
  • “The manner in which a defendant conducts his defense cannot establish his state of mind at the time he opted for self-representation.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “The manner in which a 7 defendant conducts his defense cannot establish his state of mind at the time he opted for self-representation.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Norris, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.