Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/1/1982

State v. Burris

Citations

643 P.2d 8
131 Ariz. 563
1982 Ariz. App. LEXIS 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding no reversible error in the court’s decision to preclude impeachment of a witness with a civil lawsuit where “[t]he motive and interest of [the witness] in the criminal prosecution [was] quite clear without the rejected testimony”
“the accuracy of the sworn interpreter’s interpretation may be impeached and is ultimately to be determined by the jury.”
no reversible error where witness’s motive and interest “quite clear” in record, notwithstanding rejected testimony of civil lawsuit
\the motive and interest of [the victim] in the criminal prosecution is quite clear without the rejected testimony. He was chained up and shot at by appellant\
\the accuracy of the sworn interpreter's interpretation may be impeached and is ultimately to be determined by the jury.\
The accuracy of the sworn interpreter’s interpretation may be impeached and is ultimately to be determined by the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsall, Hathaway, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.