Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 760 P.2d 131
  • 104 Nev. 409
  • 1988 Nev. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court improperly prohibited defendant from questioning a witness about a civil lawsuit the witness filed against the defendant in order to explore potential bias
  • considering same when examining a district court's decision \to curtail cross-examination into a witness's possible bias\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.