Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/29/1985
State v. Burciaga
Citations
- 705 P.2d 1384
- 146 Ariz. 333
- 1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 611
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- accepting appeal from “order granting defendant’s motion to suppress statements made by the defendant in connection with . . . a presentence report in a prior unrelated case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corcoran, Eubank, Froeb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-10-26· cited 109×
- State v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-12-12· cited 30×
- State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-04-26· cited 10×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-03-20· cited 7×
- State of Arizona v. Analysya ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-09-23· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Anthony Sanchez BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-12-12
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 189×
- State v. VallejosArizona Supreme Court· 1960-12-21· cited 55×
- State v. RomeroArizona Supreme Court· 1981-09-29· cited 21×
- State v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-09-12· cited 5×
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-09-29· cited 4×
- State v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-04-11· cited 4×
- State v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-09-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.