Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/26/2004

State v. Williams

Citations

99 P.3d 43
209 Ariz. 228
437 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that conflicting evidence goes to weight and credibility, which is for the jury to decide
noting that it is the jury’s function, not the court of appeals, to weigh the evidence and determine credibility
noting that it is the jury’s function, not the court of appeals, to weigh the evidence and to determine credibility
noting that it is the jury’s function, not the court of appeals, to weigh the evidence and to determine credibility
noting that it is the jury’s function, not the court of appeals, to weigh the evidence and determine credibility
noting that it is the jury’s function, not the court of appeals, to weigh the evidence and to determine credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winthrop, Sult, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.