Skip to main content
· 9/23/2024

State of Arizona v. Analysya Contreras

Citations

  • 557 P.3d 345

Syllabus

1. Was the trial court's general admonition that the defendant's failure to appear at sentencing could result in the loss of her right to appeal adequate to give the defendant notice under A.R.S. § 13-4033(C)? 2. Did the trial court err when it tried the defendant in absentia without inquiring further into the reasons for her absence after it presumed voluntariness under Rule 9.1, Ariz. R. Crim. P.? 3. Did the trial court err by violating the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination when it concluded the defendant had effectively raised an entrapment defense during opening statement and cross-examination, allowed the state to present rebuttal evidence, and instructed the jury on entrapment?

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.