State v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an individual could have the necessary mens rea but not be criminally culpable due to insanity
• recognizing that an individual could have the necessary mens rea but not be criminally culpable due to insanity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Herrera
  Utah Supreme Court· 1995-04-21· cited 69×
• People v. Silver
  New York Court of Appeals· 1974-03-27· cited 66×
• State v. Searcy
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-09-05· cited 64×
• State v. Gentry
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 61×
• Pickett v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1953-12-08· cited 37×
• Marmion Pollard v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1960-10-06· cited 26×
• Wiseman v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1979-06-12· cited 21×
• Valiotis v. Utah-Apex Mining Co.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1919-10-10· cited 16×
• State v. Converse
  Utah Supreme Court· 1911-12-13· cited 13×
• Pueblo v. Sánchez Maldonado
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1956-04-03· cited 11×
• Shannon v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1923-12-31· cited 7×
• State v. Reese
  Utah Supreme Court· 1914-03-20· cited 4×
• Leland v. Bourne
  Utah Supreme Court· 1912-06-03· cited 2×
• People v. Sánchez Maldonado
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1956-04-03

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Dillon
  Utah Supreme Court· 1892-01-15· cited 9×
• Hawe v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1881-07-15· cited 7×
• State v. Brown
  Utah Supreme Court· 1907-12-17· cited 5×