Utah Supreme Court· 12/1/1987

State v. Gentry

Citations

747 P.2d 1032
71 Utah Adv. Rep. 20
1987 Utah LEXIS 823
1987 WL 2216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting insufficiency argument, noting “[a]l-though the victim had different recollections of certain details of the assault, that fact is insufficient to reverse the conviction.”
persuaded by Luce’s rationale and therefore holding that to preserve for appellate review a claim of improper impeachment with a prior conviction, a defendant must testify
persuaded by Luce’s rationale and therefore holding that to preserve for appellate review a claim of improper impeachment with a prior conviction, a defendant must testify
trial court’s evidentiary ruling will not be reversed absent abuse of discretion
trial court's evidentiary ruling will not be reversed absent abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.