Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/12/1997
State v. Brown
Citations
- 242 Conn. 445
- 700 A.2d 1089
- 1997 Conn. LEXIS 273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of midtrial motion for continuance to test newly available DNA evidence on basis of consideration of length of requested continuance and negative effect on jury
- court may address related claims not certified for review in interest of judicial economy
- court may address related claims not certified for review in interest of judicial economy
- court may address related claims not certified for review in interest of judicial economy
- court may address related claims not certified for review in interest of judicial economy
- for reasons of judicial economy, Supreme Court decided trial court had not abused discretion in denying motion for new trial even though, on appeal, this court did not decide issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Callahan, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 162×
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-11-03· cited 81×
- Montoya v. MontoyaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-12-05· cited 36×
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-24· cited 35×
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-09-17· cited 24×
- State v. RyderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-09· cited 20×
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-05-11· cited 12×
- Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-09· cited 9×
- Louis Gherlone Excavating, Inc. v. McLean Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-05-10· cited 8×
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-04· cited 7×
- State v. KomisarjevskySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-04-12· cited 7×
- State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-05-15· cited 6×
- State v. JacobsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-25· cited 5×
- Little River, LLC v. ZajicekConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-29· cited 1×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 1,226×
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 184×
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 149×
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-25· cited 129×
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-02-25· cited 100×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-11· cited 100×
- Ridgeway v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-13· cited 98×
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-18· cited 94×
- State v. BeckenbachSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-10· cited 77×
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-05-25· cited 73×
- State v. RothenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-02-19· cited 73×
- State v. AillonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-03· cited 73×
- State v. SimmsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-11-25· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.