State v. Brown

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2645

Syllabus

REOPENING – App.R. 26(B) second pro se application to reopen Appellant's direct appeal ineffective assistance of appellate counsel App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b) the trial court sentenced Appellant within the authorized statutory ranges Appellant's consecutive sentence is not contrary to law Appellant again fails to meet the standard for reopening this appeal Appellant's arguments were either raised or could have been raised in his prior reopening and, thus, are barred by the doctrine of res judicata no case authority authorizing a party to file successive applications for reopening and/or reconsiderations of applications for reopening second application denied.