Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1917

Syllabus

REOPENING – App.R. 26(B) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel timely filed pro se application App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b) Appellant fails to meet the standard for reopening this appeal pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 (1984) Appellant fails to provide any analysis to support his assignments of error concerning his sentence R.C. 2953.08(G) R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 R.C. 2929.13 R.C. 2929.14 maximum sentence consecutive sentence allied offenses the trial court sentenced Appellant within the authorized statutory ranges Appellant's consecutive sentence is not contrary to law Appellant fails to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel on appeal application denied.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.