Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 716

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it allowed the arresting officer to testify regarding excited utterances made to him by the victim, who did not testify at trial, and appellant's right to confront the witnesses against him was not violated. Appellant's convictions for assault and obstructing official business were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.