New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 7/13/1988
State v. Brown
Citations
- 547 A.2d 743
- 227 N.J. Super. 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- aggravating element of proximity to school does not violate due process
- New Jersey “drug-free zone” statute was intended to protect children from both sale of drugs and indirect harm from exposure to an unsafe environment
- state legislature had a legitimate and reasonable basis for the termination of mens rea about the school’s proximity to achieve its protective purpose to shield school children from the violent and dangerous narcotic criminal milieu
- state legislature had a legitimate and reasonable basis for the termination of mens rea about the school's proximity to achieve its protective purpose to shield school children from the violent and dangerous narcotic criminal milieu
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Imbriani
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. AlvarezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-07-24· cited 49×
- Dawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-08· cited 46×
- State v. OgarNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-01-03· cited 38×
- State v. GonzalezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-02-25· cited 37×
- Polk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-07-23· cited 30×
- State v. MooreUtah Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 22×
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-03-01· cited 21×
- State v. AnayaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-01-08· cited 20×
- State v. CengizNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-06-01· cited 19×
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-09-20· cited 17×
- Velez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-01· cited 16×
- Smiley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-04· cited 9×
- State v. GrahamNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-01-14· cited 8×
- State v. ShawNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-12-10· cited 6×
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ENOC PIMENTEL (15-06-0517, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-11-22
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1968-04-08· cited 1,409×
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 1,233×
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1978-12-11· cited 468×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-06-19· cited 191×
- State v. Des MaretsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-01-26· cited 179×
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-06-30· cited 171×
- Town Tobacconist v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-07-19· cited 160×
- State v. KovackSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-12-07· cited 130×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-05-07· cited 130×
- United States v. Rufus HollandD.C. Circuit· 1987-02-06· cited 121×
- United States v. Ramon FaluSecond Circuit· 1985-10-30· cited 100×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-04-12· cited 72×
- Ryland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 70×
- State v. FearickSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-01-08· cited 66×
- State v. MoralesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-11-10· cited 22×
- Mister Softee v. Mayor and Council of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1962-11-14· cited 15×
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.