State v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a defendant is entitled to a suppression hearing on motion filed in accordance with Rule 4-252 raising a factual dispute
• “In this State, a hearing is customarily held in connection with the determination of any motion to suppress filed pursuant to Maryland Rule 4-252. Where a factual dispute is central to the resolution of the motion an evidentiary hearing is required.”
• “If the post conviction court determines that the reason for the lack of protest or objection was a matter of trial tactics or was otherwise a considered decision on the part of defense counsel, then the defendant is not entitled to relief’
• at conclusion of suppression hearing
• at conclusion of suppression hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Perry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-16· cited 60×
• Muhammad v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-11-05· cited 29×
• Portillo Funes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-06-30· cited 15×
• In Re Emileigh F.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-18· cited 13×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-06· cited 13×
• Holmes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-02-15· cited 9×
• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-28· cited 9×
• Moye v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-09· cited 5×
• Green v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-05