State v. Brown
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1079
Syllabus
Appellant has not established a due-process violation based on the State's failure to preserve bloody items recovered from the scene of the victim's kidnapping. The record does not reflect prosecutorial misconduct based on a failure to disclose the victim's cell-phone records or the identity of her cell-phone service provider. The trial court did not err in admitting testimony about the victim's bloody wallet and cell phone being found near the scene of her kidnapping. The record does not portray ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Appellant's convictions were supported by legally sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-28· cited 30×
- State v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-08· cited 15×
- State v. McClainOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 14×
- State v. KinneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.