Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/28/1963
State v. Mastrian
Citations
- 266 Minn. 58
- 122 N.W.2d 621
- 1963 Minn. LEXIS 708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[t]he purpose of arrest and confinement of [an accused] is to assure his presence at * * ⅜ trial * * ⅞ [while] [t]he purpose of bail * ⅜ * is to permit his release if appearance at trial can otherwise be guaranteed”
- holding that \[t]he purpose of arrest and confinement of [an accused] is to assure his presence at * * * trial * * * [while] [t]he purpose of bail * * * is to permit his release if appearance at trial can otherwise be guaranteed\
- “The purpose of bail * * * is to permit [defendant’s] release if appearance at trial can otherwise be guaranteed.”
- \The purpose of bail * * * is to permit [defendant's] release if appearance at trial can otherwise be guaranteed.\
- purpose of bail is to permit defendant’s release if trial appearance can otherwise be guaranteed
- purpose of bail is to permit defendant’s release if trial appearance can otherwise be guaranteed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Norman J. Mastrian v. Kermit Hedman, Ramsey County Sheriff, and the State of MinnesotaEighth Circuit· 1964-03-30· cited 92×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-03-15· cited 55×
- State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-10-17· cited 49×
- State Ex Rel. Mastrian v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-07-28· cited 20×
- State v. LeDOUXSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-08-13· cited 8×
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1976-10-11· cited 8×
- State v. SuperSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-09-27· cited 7×
- State v. FreitagSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-08-30· cited 3×
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-10-01· cited 3×
- State v. WhitcombCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-10-20· cited 2×
- Farsdale v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-11-24· cited 2×
- Harold Farsdale, State of Minnesota v. Oscar Rios MartinezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-11-24
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 1,157×
- In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-06-19· cited 49×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co.Supreme Court· 1955-02-14· cited 19×
- Gusick v. BoiesArizona Supreme Court· 1951-06-26· cited 18×
- Ex Parte MalleyNevada Supreme Court· 1927-06-03· cited 13×
- Application of KennedyNebraska Supreme Court· 1960-01-08· cited 7×
- Wadey v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-12-18· cited 3×
- Sentner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-02-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.