Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2/3/2004
State v. Brennan
Citations
- 674 N.W.2d 200
- 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 102
- 2004 WL 193088
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the “issuing judge is entitled to draw common-sense and reasonable inferences from the facts and circumstances”
- “[T]he issuing judge [of a search warrant] is entitled to draw common-sense and reasonable inferences from the facts and circumstances set forth in an affidavit.”
- it was reasonable to infer that, because of the ease with which the defendant could transport his portable work laptop to his house, “the illicit images found on the laptop would also be found on [the defendant’s home computer”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willis, Klaphake, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FelixDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-06· cited 13×
- State v. ByrneSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2009-06-19· cited 7×
- People v. ReyesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-11-24· cited 7×
- State v. EichersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-12-02· cited 6×
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kyle Dean McCLAIN, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-05-05· cited 3×
- State v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-04-08· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1997-07-10· cited 263×
- United States v. Peter John WeberNinth Circuit· 1991-01-15· cited 165×
- United States v. David Scott ZimmermanThird Circuit· 2002-01-04· cited 160×
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-19· cited 133×
- United States v. Alexander Montagu HayNinth Circuit· 2000-10-24· cited 131×
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-08-04· cited 111×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-01-07· cited 76×
- State v. SoutoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-05-14· cited 64×
- United States v. Daniel Chrobak, Also Known as Dan ChrobakEighth Circuit· 2002-05-07· cited 53×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-07· cited 36×
- State v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-10-29· cited 28×
- State v. BockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-07-21· cited 15×
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-14· cited 14×
- State v. EgglerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-07-30· cited 11×
- State v. SecordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-06-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.