State v. Bradley
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3352
Syllabus
The trial court's decision to deny the defendant's motion to suppress is affirmed. Appellant failed to provide contrary evidence to question the reliability of the officer's testimony. The trier of fact is in the best position to determine issues of credibility. Appellant failed to establish that he was indigent. The court's imposition of mandatory fines and costs pursuant to O.R. C. 4511.19(G)(1) is affirmed.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- City of Maumee v. WeisnerOhio Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 485×
- City of Bowling Green v. GodwinOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 120×
- State v. SteedOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-09· cited 16×
- State v. StoneOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.