Skip to main content

State v. Boyle

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2887

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in categorizing appellant's motion as a petition for post-conviction relief and denying it on the basis that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the untimely petition. Alternatively, the trial court did not err in considering appellant's motion as a request for public records and denying it due to appellant's failure to demonstrate the information he sought was necessary to support a justiciable claim or defense. Lastly, in construing a portion of appellant's motion as a request for court records, the trial court properly instructed appellant as to how to correctly request those records. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.