State v. Borrero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that error in criminal information is not a basis for reversal absent prejudice
• information containing a numerical statutory citation error was not constitutionally deficient because it was a “scrivener’s error” and the information nonetheless properly apprised defendant of the “essential elements of the crime charged”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Borrero
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 53×
• State v. Taylor
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-03-30· cited 34×
• State v. Benitez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-06-11· cited 26×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-09· cited 24×
• State v. Rivas
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-19· cited 22×
• State Of Washington, V. John Marshall Briggs
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-08-02· cited 11×
• State v. Kiliona-Garramone
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-11-22· cited 7×
• State Of Washington v. Talyn K.j. Benitez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-06-11

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Vangerpen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-02-09· cited 277×
• State v. Leach
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-11-22· cited 215×
• State v. Dent
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-03-10· cited 116×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 111×
• State v. Moavenzadeh
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 50×
• State v. Ralph
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-02-11· cited 18×
• State v. Rhode
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-10-07· cited 16×
• State v. Chaten
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-19· cited 14×
• State v. Bacani
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-09-25· cited 11×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-07-17· cited 5×