State v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing Chaten and holding that, strictly construed, “assault” does not convey the essential element of “intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Taylor
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-03-30· cited 34×
• State v. Borrero
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-23· cited 15×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kjorsvik
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 539×
• State v. Hopper
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-01-07· cited 121×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 111×
• State v. Davis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-09-10· cited 78×
• State v. Moavenzadeh
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 50×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-07-30· cited 21×
• State v. Dukowitz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-08-19· cited 20×
• State v. Chaten
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-19· cited 14×
• State v. Chaten
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-10-30· cited 9×