State v. Bonstetter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the cost of an audit paid by a victim was recoverable as part of a restitution order but denying it because the prosecutor did not present sufficient evidence of the audit’s cost
• affirming restitution order to the extent that it ordered repayment of damages to defendant’s employer for lost profits
• utilizing the maxim of statutory construction, inclusio unius est exclusio alterius, which means the “inclusion of one is the exclusion of the other”
• determining the intent of the legislature by considering the language of the statute
• explaining that restitution “serves multiple purposes” including compensation
• examining what a victim could recover in a civil conversion case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).