Supreme Court of Iowa· 1/22/2004

State v. Paxton

Citations

674 N.W.2d 106
2004 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 43
2004 WL 96792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a restitution amount should be reduced dollar-for-dollar for payments previously made to a victim by a defendant’s employer
holding pecuniary damages under section 910.1(3) are limited to those damages that a victim could recover against the offender in a civil action; thus, the common-law rules of set off apply to prevent a double recovery
holding pecuniary damages under section 910.1(3) are limited to those damages that a victim could recover against the offender in a civil action; thus, the common-law rules of set off apply to prevent a double recovery
analyzing the “victim’s potential civil recovery” to determine whether a reduction in restitution was appropriate
describing legislative intent behind definition of pecuniary damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.