Maricopa County v. Arizona Tax Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs’ only alternative was to serve their notices of appeal on a member of the Board of Supervisors or its clerk
• holding that when the Maricopa County Attorney has not yet appeared as counsel for the County, service on the County Attorney’s office pursuant to Rule 5(c) is not available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).