Washington Supreme Court· 7/2/1991

State v. Farmer

Citations

805 P.2d 200
116 Wash. 2d 414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that “[t]he United States Supreme Court recognizes such a fundamental right of privacy to exist in matters relating to freedom of choice regarding one’s personal life”; recognizing a “similar” right of privacy under article I, section 7
upholding exceptional 71/2-year sentence based on finding of deliberate cruelty where defendant knowingly exposed his two minor victims to HIV
criminal defendant must establish standing to challenge the vagueness of a statute; generally, one must claim the statute is vague as to one's own conduct
criminal defendant must establish standing to challenge the vagueness of a statute; generally, one must claim the statute is vague as to one’s own conduct
“issues not supported by argument and citation to authority will not be considered on appeal”
a sentence that is within the guidelines as provided by law is not arbitrary or shocking to the sense 6 No. 54354-1-II of justice to constitute cruel and unusual punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.