Skip to main content

State v. Bogan

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4211

Syllabus

Mistrial manifest necessity juror bias misconduct jury deliberations discharge objection verdict form consent implied consent totality of circumstances dismiss abuse of discretion double jeopardy. Because the trial court's declaration of a mistrial was made with defendant's implicit consent, this is not the rare or exceptional case where the protections of the Double Jeopardy Clause require the dismissal of his indictment with prejudice. The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.