Alaska Supreme Court· 4/30/2004

State v. Blank

Citations

90 P.3d 156
2004 Alas. LEXIS 57
2004 WL 928163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding a warrantless search under implied-consent statute valid provided there were exigent circumstances
holding a warrantless search under implied-consent statute valid provided there were exigent circumstances
addressing the merits of an issue that the lower court did not rule upon because the issue raised a “pure question of law” and it was “more expeditious” to reach it on appeal
construing AS 28.35.031(g) to include the three requirements outlined in Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 710-72, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 1835-36, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966): (1) probable cause to search, (2) a recognized exception to the warrant requirement, and (3) reasonable procedures
interpreted statute similar to K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 8-1001[b][2] to incorporate requirements of Schmerber
interpreting statute to incorporate requirements of Schmerber v. California

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.