Court of Appeals of Alaska· 6/1/2018
Hurlburt v. State
Citations
- 425 P.3d 189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing aggregation of knowledge of collaborating officers based on \inevitable discovery\ rationale only applies to \unusual facts\
- adopting inevitability exception in analysis of reasonable suspicion in case involving driving under influence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 1,440×
- United States v. MassenburgFourth Circuit· 2011-08-15· cited 135×
- Pooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-06· cited 76×
- United States v. Phillip Scott RagsdaleFifth Circuit· 1973-01-17· cited 61×
- State v. BlankAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-04-30· cited 37×
- McCormick v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-03-10· cited 18×
- Blank v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-05-19· cited 17×
- State v. PraterCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-05-22· cited 9×
- Galimba v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-03-16· cited 8×
- Newsom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2009-01-09· cited 7×
- State v. RahierNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-07-17· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.