Sloan v. Hardee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating courts must not resort to subtle or forced construction to expand a statute’s operation
• applying public importance standing to decide whether certain SCDOT Commissioners were lawfully appointed
• applying public importance standing to decide whether certain SCDOT Commissioners were lawfully appointed
• \The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.\
• \Words must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resort to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand the statute's operation.\
• \Words must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resort to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand the statute's operation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).