Arizona Supreme Court· 10/10/1989
State v. Blackhoop
Citations
- 162 Ariz. 121
- 781 P.2d 599
- 45 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 10
- 1989 Ariz. LEXIS 176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Technical errors in jury selection do not require a new trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Corcoran, Determination, Feldman, Filing, Gordon, Holohan, Matter, Moeller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CotaArizona Supreme Court· 2012-03-22· cited 61×
- State v. DetrichArizona Supreme Court· 1997-02-25· cited 36×
- State v. SabalosCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-02-28· cited 7×
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Michael MontoyaArizona Supreme Court· 2024-08-15· cited 5×
- State of Tennessee v. Albert Franklin Thompkins, Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2023-11-22
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court· 1978-04-14· cited 132×
- State v. LatigueArizona Supreme Court· 1972-11-17· cited 65×
- State v. SUPERIOR CT IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-07-19· cited 46×
- State v. EisenlordCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-09-20· cited 16×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-06-20· cited 10×
- State v. BlackhoopCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-11-22· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.